How the numbers are made

Community activity, a written claim about why it matters, then a business result. Nothing skips the middle step.

  1. Community signal

    What happened

    Posts, answers, attendance, commits. Counted, deduplicated, traceable back to the source.

  2. Bridge metric

    Why you think it matters

    Your claim, written down and printed on the screen, where anyone in the room can disagree with it.

  3. Business result

    What the business already tracks

    Renewals, referrals, support cost. Priced with your numbers and owned by a named person.

A worked example

Community signal

1,180 questions answered by members

Bridge metric

Members resolve 34% of questions, up from 29%

The claim: a question answered in the forum is a ticket that never opens.

Business result

Support cost lower by $47k to $71k

Priced with your own cost per ticket.

Why we do not just compare members to everyone else

Because the people who join a community were already your most engaged customers. Comparing them to everyone else credits the community with something it did not cause. We compare each member against their own behaviour before they joined instead.

A test where we knew the real answer was +15%

Members compared to everyone else +62% to +72%
Members compared to their own past +14.7% to +17.5%

The test is repeatable, and the method behind any number is named on the screen showing it.

What a bridge can come back as

Written down
Authored, and waiting on enough data to test.
Measurable
The data is there. Not yet judged.
Supported
The evidence backs the claim.
Not supported
Tested, and the evidence does not back it.
Not enough evidence
Too early to call it either way.

Three rules

  • Community activity never connects straight to a business result. A written claim always sits in between.
  • Every dollar figure comes from a number you gave us.
  • You get a range whenever the method leaves room for one.