Two questions, answered on the same data

What the community contributed to the business, in dollars, as a range rather than a single number. Broken down by renewals, referrals and support cost, with the results we can measure but cannot honestly price listed separately.

The claims you make about how community activity moves a business result, and what the evidence says about each one. Every claim keeps its verdict on screen, including the ones that came back wrong.

Whether the community itself is in good shape, scored across content, events and connections. This is the number you manage week to week, and the reason the contribution figure keeps growing or stops.

Who is actually in your community, with their accounts across every tool joined into one person, so nobody gets counted three times and your most active members stop hiding behind four usernames.

The three things a community actually does: publishes, gathers, and introduces people to each other. Each gets its own screen, and every number above is built from these.

Where your community sits against comparable ones. Off until enough communities are in a group that no single one can be identified from the comparison.